Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Scroll-linked Animations (#330)

Thanks for filing this review! 

We're excited to see this spec continue to improve.  It looks like there's still quite a bit that still needs to be filled out, and that's OK at an early stage as long as you're aware that there are a bunch more pieces that need to be written.  (For example, what happens if the `<time>` argument to `scroll()` is omitted?)

We note that the web animations spec has high coupling with this proposal... is there an intent to re-integrate into that spec in the future?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/330#issuecomment-460560479