Re: [heycam/webidl] Stop using extended attributes for constructors (#636) from Daniel Ehrenberg on 2019-02-04 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from February 2019)

From: Daniel Ehrenberg <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 05:16:52 -0800
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/issues/636/460246320@github.com>

We discussed multiple browser-specific use cases for extended attributes on specific constructor overloads in #485. Would it be reasonable to define what it means to include extended attributes on constructor overloads in WebIDL, even if we don't have a web spec that would use that capability at the moment?

cc @kmiller68

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/636#issuecomment-460246320

Received on Monday, 4 February 2019 13:17:14 UTC