- From: Michael Prentice <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 23:06:53 -0800
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/manifest/issues/835/566411454@github.com>
> "Good" sites are kind of irrelevant here. As a developer, I find this worrying. As far as I understand it, "good sites" are the ones who are pushing for this feature to be implemented. While I understand that the title of this issue is focused on "bad sites", abuse, and confusion; calling "good site" developers and their product team requirements "irrelevant" seems a bit heartless and rude. I'm happy to hear that Mozilla plans to try out some ambient badging strategies for surfacing a non-intrusive install action. I continue to be unhappy with WebKit's "perspective" and vision of PWAs, especially the current implementation of the Add to Home Screen browser UI. I would like to see more proposals (solutions) and activity in the PWA space from WebKit. I'm grateful for the Chromium team to be pushing forward and adjusting proposals and implementations in the PWA area. I'm happy that they are willing to share their references, policies, and insight while being open to feedback and input. It will be unfortunate if `beforeinstallprompt` is removed from the spec, but all I am really concerned with is giving developers the tools to implement high quality UX PWA installation flows. If this comes in the form of another proposal, I'm fine with that. I don't want more unsolicited pop up prompts in the web content area (I don't see anyone advocating for that), but I do feel that giving developers the ability to have some control over the timing of the installation process is critical. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/835#issuecomment-566411454
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2019 07:06:56 UTC