- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:39:41 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2019 18:39:43 UTC
I guess I'd say that for this case and the `[Clamp] long?` case the intermediate solution is to allow (and mostly ignore) extended attributes to apply to the null case of a nullable type and a potential longer term solution (especially now that Kagami has a tool to rewrite IDL in specifications) is to introduce a `null` type and get rid of nullables. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/827#issuecomment-565131350
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2019 18:39:43 UTC