- From: alancutter <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:55:57 -0800
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/manifest/pull/834/review/330258180@github.com>
alancutter commented on this pull request. > @@ -1492,8 +1494,7 @@ <h3> </li> <li>Set <var>manifest</var>["<a>start_url</a>"] to the result of running <a>processing the <code>start_url</code> member</a> given - <var>manifest</var>["<a>start_url</a>"], <var>manifest URL</var>, and - <var>document URL</var>. + <var>manifest</var>["<a>start_url</a>"] and <var>manifest URL</var>. </li> <li>Set <var>manifest</var>["<a>lang</a>"] to the result of running <a>processing the <code>lang</code> member</a> given This comment is for line 1506. start_url can now be undefined, the processing for scope segfaults. > @@ -1982,13 +1983,11 @@ <h3> <p> The steps for <dfn>processing the <code>start_url</code> member</dfn> are given by the following algorithm. The algorithm takes a - <a>USVString</a> <var>value</var>, a <a>URL</a> <var>manifest - URL</var>, and a <a>URL</a> <var>document URL</var>. This algorithm - returns a <a>URL</a>. + <a>USVString</a> <var>value</var>, and a <a>URL</a> <var>manifest + URL</var>. This algorithm returns a <a>URL</a> or undefined. Can we default to processing '.' instead of returning undefined? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/834#pullrequestreview-330258180
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2019 01:56:00 UTC