- From: alancutter <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:55:57 -0800
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/manifest/pull/834/review/330258180@github.com>
alancutter commented on this pull request.
> @@ -1492,8 +1494,7 @@ <h3>
</li>
<li>Set <var>manifest</var>["<a>start_url</a>"] to the result of
running <a>processing the <code>start_url</code> member</a> given
- <var>manifest</var>["<a>start_url</a>"], <var>manifest URL</var>, and
- <var>document URL</var>.
+ <var>manifest</var>["<a>start_url</a>"] and <var>manifest URL</var>.
</li>
<li>Set <var>manifest</var>["<a>lang</a>"] to the result of running
<a>processing the <code>lang</code> member</a> given
This comment is for line 1506. start_url can now be undefined, the processing for scope segfaults.
> @@ -1982,13 +1983,11 @@ <h3>
<p>
The steps for <dfn>processing the <code>start_url</code> member</dfn>
are given by the following algorithm. The algorithm takes a
- <a>USVString</a> <var>value</var>, a <a>URL</a> <var>manifest
- URL</var>, and a <a>URL</a> <var>document URL</var>. This algorithm
- returns a <a>URL</a>.
+ <a>USVString</a> <var>value</var>, and a <a>URL</a> <var>manifest
+ URL</var>. This algorithm returns a <a>URL</a> or undefined.
Can we default to processing '.' instead of returning undefined?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/834#pullrequestreview-330258180
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2019 01:56:00 UTC