Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Sketch out spec text for transaction durability option (#301) from Victor Costan on 2019-12-06 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from December 2019)

From: Victor Costan <notifications@github.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 03:02:17 -0800
To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/pull/301/c562529995@github.com>

Do we want to throw if a non-default option is set for readonly transactions? -- I agree with you.

It makes more sense to me that all transactions have a durability property that behaves in the same way. Since it's intended to be a hint, the hint will be ignored in read-only transactions.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/301#issuecomment-562529995

Received on Friday, 6 December 2019 11:02:19 UTC