Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Update issue templates (#447)

torgo commented on this pull request.



>    - Tests: [wpt folder(s), if available]
-  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification): [github usernames and affiliation]
-  - Organization/project driving the specification: [organization or project name] 
+  - Security and Privacy self-review²: [url]
+  - GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): [url]
+  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification): 
+      - [name] ([github username]), [organization/s] (repeat as necessary)
+  - Organization(s)/project(s) driving the specification: [organization and/or project name] 
+  - Existing major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: 

Concerned this may be overly draconian? Maybe drop "major" or change to "evidence of multi-stakeholder review, discussiomn or support of this specification:" ?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/pull/447#pullrequestreview-327945465