Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web Publications review (#344)

Thanks, @mattgarrish and @iherman. This has dramatically changed shape... would you like us to review the [manifest](https://github.com/w3c/pub-manifest)?

We're happy to do that, if you like. It probably makes sense to open a new review for that.

As we're looking over the doc now, one question comes to mind: given that we are trying to resolve [our issue on the proliferation of manifests in web specs](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/423), are there opportunities to reconcile this with other manifests? 

We'll close this issue, but would be happy to pursue that discussion in our [issue 423](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/423) or in a new issue for your manifest, if that's helpful to you.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/344#issuecomment-561867391