Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebAssembly integration with ECMAScript modules (#377)

Apologies for my delay here.

> As far as we understand most of this has landed in most browsers as part of Web Assembly MVP. Is that assumption correct?

No, this proposal is not implemented in any browser. There are only experimental implementations in tooling.

This proposal has been waiting on:
- Implementer interest. Browsers have reviewed the proposal or even drove/funded parts of it.
- In the past, top-level await (to handle the asynchronous-ness of Wasm module instantiation). This is now at Stage 3 in TC39, and browser implementations are now coming.
- Now, clarity on whether WebAssembly modules should be specially marked, e.g., with module attributes. @rniwa [indicated](https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/839#issuecomment-542327813) that he would prefer this, but that it is not a show-stopper the way that this annotation is necessary for JSON modules.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/377#issuecomment-561696976