- From: Ryosuke Niwa <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:20:00 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2019 18:20:23 UTC
> We explicitly did not allow `*` as it's an easy performance mistake to make that's not necessarily always noticeable. Right, that was the past discussion due to some folks from Google objecting to it. However, I'd prefer allowing `*` better than allowing re-definitions of the custom elements because the latter leads to weird things to consider like what happens when the constructor of the old custom element definition gets called after re-definition, etc... In fact, I object to any proposal that involves re-definition / update of the custom element constructor itself. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/829#issuecomment-525423030
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2019 18:20:23 UTC