- From: Dominic Farolino <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 06:20:51 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/398/525297860@github.com>
TLDR: I don't think this is ready for a deep review by the TAG, I just wanted to file this issue very early while Chrome and other vendors get their stance straight and proposing ideas in case TAG had any early input. --- > Is there any explainer in plan to get a better idea what's being done here? (maybe this document if of help). Ah, yes I actually wrote that document. No explainer yet, as the ultimate direction is not entirely clear yet (sorry). > Any view on finalising the pulls referenced above? RE spec: I'll defer to @yoavweiss, as he is currently authoring the spec changes relevant here. But as Anne mentioned, I agree a lot of that is blocked on how implementations decide to move forward. To be clear: I think we'll likely not have any progress on this until after TPAC when vendors discuss this a bit more, so feel free to defer seriously at this looking until a meeting after 2019-09-04 (when the current label suggests this will be looked at closer). Just wanted to file an issue at the same time as I wrote Chromium's Intent-to-Implement to get his out earlier rather than later. > Are you filling a security/privacy questionnaire? I will, however this won't be done until the direction is more clear (see above). > Might be useful context [...] Ah, yes I wrote that too :) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/398#issuecomment-525297860
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2019 13:21:13 UTC