[w3c/ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda - 16 September 2019 (#1460)

# Where

**Location:** [TPAC](https://www.w3.org/2019/09/TPAC/), Fukuoka, Japan
**When:** 8:30 AM, 16 September 2019 (do people prefer we start at 9 AM?)

# Minutes

* TBD

# Attendance

Please register at the [TPAC registration page](https://www.w3.org/2019/09/TPAC/registration.html). Members can access the [registration list](https://www.w3.org/register/tpac2019/registrants).

# Agenda

The agenda is still in the brainstorming phase. Please add if you notice things missing by editing this directly or replying with a comment.

How to allocate time between these sections is TBD. Thoughts welcome.

## Implementer update

Should we do this?

## Interesting new feature requests

* support efficient offline redirects: #1457 
* A way to specify a pattern of destination URLs to hit/skip SW #1454
  * Related #1195, #1026 
* Client lifecycle with bfcache, frozen tabs
  * Add an option to include frozen documents. #1442
  * Consider how Client API should behave with bfcache: #1038.
  * Related #626
* Periodic Background Sync https://github.com/beverloo/periodic-background-sync
* SW lifetime:
  * A way to immediately unregister a service worker #614
  * Allow active worker to immediately evict itself #1296 
* Spec for double-keyed service workers? 
* Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules #1407

## Changes & bugs

I'm picking some issues that seem worth discussing in real-time... feel free to add more.

* "no-cors" CSS SOP violation #719
* provide a way to execute work after browser has consumed a response #1397
* spec says cache should return responses with immutable headers, but no browser does that #1456
* Add a script version property to the ServiceWorker object #1387
* Add registeringClientId to the ServiceWorker object #1379
* Clarification on what happens during a terminated activation #1372
* Expose `display` mode (e.g. `standalone`) on `client` #1370
* ... much more to be added ...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1460