Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] support efficient offline redirects (#1457)

They may be temporary redirects to give them the flexibility to change the shape of actual.com in the future.

But still, my impression was there was no guarantee even 301 permanent redirects would remain cached and they could still be evicted.  Stack overflow suggests chrome and firefox set no expiry, but they will still get evicted to make room for new entries:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9130422/how-long-do-browsers-cache-http-301s

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1457#issuecomment-521643479