- From: Alice <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 18:19:42 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 9 August 2019 01:20:04 UTC
I feel there has been some miscommunication here: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/387#issuecomment-519634016 > if the Badge API is present, it implies a badge will be shown either in the dock (if app is installed) or in a browser tab (regular browser instance). If implementors needn't implement support for all badging surfaces at once, then it the presence of the API necessarily does *not* imply a badge will be shown in a browser tab. > consider the case that @hober brought up regarding document title. @hober was suggesting that if the tab is not successfully badged via the badging API, the author might wish to fall back to existing hacks _including_ document title (usually _as well as_ directly setting an alternative favicon), which are known to work under certain circumstances where the badging API may be used as an alternative _if_ it is implemented there. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/387#issuecomment-519742133
Received on Friday, 9 August 2019 01:20:04 UTC