Re: [whatwg/dom] Introduce a StaticRange constructor (#590)

That's a good point actually - we wouldn't want an author to take a dependency on `StaticRange` working with `Attr` if we don't want to support it long term. I certainly don't see a use case for why we would need to support it.

So are we fine with disallowing `DocumentType` and `Attr` then? If so, I can get going with the spec PR, tests and implementation bugs.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/590#issuecomment-519288651