- From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 13:05:23 -0700
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2019 20:05:45 UTC
> "nytimes.techsupport.fr doesn't have access but the top level frame (nytimes.com) does have access so grant access to the iframe" @raymeskhoury Doesn't the current language still prevent persisting permission to nytimes.com times in this case? Doesn't it need to say something like: *"The user’s interaction may provide new information about the user’s intent for this realm and other realms with the same origin, or other realms with the same origin as the origin used to grant the permission"* ? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/185#issuecomment-518823018
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2019 20:05:45 UTC