Re: [heycam/webidl] [SecureContext] handling for mixins seems to be slightly broken (#762)

> So given interfaces [SecureContext] A and (insecure) B, and mixin [SecureContext] C. I think both A and B should be able to include C. 

Sure, this already works in the spec.

> A partial interface that has [SecureContext] should probably not work for A

Apart from being redundant, why not?  I guess redundancy is the same reason we disallow duplication between members and their containers...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/762#issuecomment-518680983

Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2019 13:58:18 UTC