Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda - 25 October 2018 (#1303)

@asakusuma Ah fair enough, we can continue here. As an implementor I feel I like the contract of  unregister(force) or skipWaiting(timeout) over terminate(). Whether to declaim clients or evict the active worker is only indirectly related to whether the active worker is actually running. I can imagine some race conditions where we terminate the active worker but it gets woken up before activation can be triggered.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1303#issuecomment-434582316