- From: Matt Falkenhagen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:02:59 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2018 07:03:21 UTC
@asakusuma Ah fair enough, we can continue here. As an implementor I feel I like the contract of unregister(force) or skipWaiting(timeout) over terminate(). Whether to declaim clients or evict the active worker is only indirectly related to whether the active worker is actually running. I can imagine some race conditions where we terminate the active worker but it gets woken up before activation can be triggered. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1303#issuecomment-434582316
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2018 07:03:21 UTC