Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How should various document internal references work when SVG is being used in shadow DOM (#179)

> Not true if they're fragment-only; those are kept as fragments and are always a local reference. They'd be affected by this.

Yes, of course. I just meant that _if_ we want to make something absolute, there is a syntax to represent it.

But yes, I wasn't thinking that absolute vs local hash isn't enough, because you can have nested shadow trees, and you still need to match the hash against the tree in which it was defined.

So, if a new syntax is needed for hash-URLs to define its tree scope then, yes, it makes sense to reuse the same syntax for other locally-scoped references in CSS.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/179#issuecomment-434046769