Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review Decentralized identifiers (DIDs) (#216)

Hey @hadleybeeman, just noticed you re-opened this... and based on TAG's "review early, please" request at W3C TPAC, I guess we're ready for review (especially since we're going to ask for a DID WG in 2019. The reason that we've been hesitant to have a TAG review is because the spec isn't polished yet (implementations are speeding along, mostly aligned with the intent of the spec, although the details still need to be sorted -- and we were waiting for those details to be settled before asking for a review).

So, if TAG is okay with specs that are expected to be updated, then we're ok we having a review done. I suggest reading this first:

https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-primer/

Then this:

https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-wg-proposal/

Then the specification:

https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-spec/

Pay particular attention to open issues and PRs to make sure you don't re-open issues that have already been identified:

https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-spec/issues/

NOTE: This isn't the "official" request for review by the W3C Credentials Communtiy Group, but I expect that will be forthcoming after our next call.

/cc @jandrieu @ChristopherA @kimdhamilton

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/216#issuecomment-433899769