- From: Daniel Ehrenberg <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 04:06:55 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/314@github.com>
Sziasztok TAG, I'm requesting a TAG review of: - Name: JavaScript class decorators - Specification URL: https://tc39.github.io/proposal-decorators/ - Explainer, Requirements Doc, or Example code: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-decorators/ - Tests: None (will write after Stage 3) - Primary contacts: @wycats @bterlson @littledan Further details (optional): - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: A review before mid-January will be appreciated, to ensure that we have this feedback before asking TC39 for Stage 3. - [x] I have read and filled out the [Self-Review Questionnare on Security and Privacy](https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/). The answer to all questions is "no". Care has been taken to not unexpectedly expose private state to decorators. - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [API Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/) You should also know that... We would love to hear whether and how decorators may be useful for web platform APIs. We are considering a decorator standard library as a follow-on proposal. We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one): - [x] open issues in our Github repo for each point of feedback - [ ] open a single issue in our Github repo for the entire review - [ ] leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify [github usernames] -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/314
Received on Monday, 29 October 2018 11:07:23 UTC