- From: Thomas Steiner <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 02:42:01 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 29 October 2018 09:42:22 UTC
FYI: @jeffposnick, @philipwalton for Workbox requirements. The *tl;dr* of this issue is: - There is [super rough proposal](https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/863#issuecomment-353070261) to add metadata ("added to cache" timestamp, "last accessed" timestamp) to cached items, so you no longer have to [resort to IDB](https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/863#issuecomment-433061240) for this information in order to implement cache expiration strategies. - The (preferred?!) alternative would be to just [allow IDB to store `Request`s and `Response`s](https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/863#issuecomment-433063809). - At the TPAC F2F, we (IIRC) agreed that it was not desirable to [implement these strategies as part of the Cache API itself](https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/863#issue-144925938) (as initially suggested when opening the issue). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/863#issuecomment-433846090
Received on Monday, 29 October 2018 09:42:22 UTC