[w3ctag/design-reviews] Tag Review Request: Temporal proposal (#311)

Bonjour TAG,

I'm requesting a TAG review of:

  - Name: Temporal proposal
  - Specification URL: https://tc39.github.io/proposal-temporal/spec-rendered
  - Explainer, Requirements Doc, or Example code: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal
  - Tests: https://github.com/pipobscure/tc39-proposal-temporal/tree/master/test
  - Primary contacts: @maggiepint @pipobscure @mj1856

Further details (optional):

  - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: Feedback is requested before this feature is proposed for Stage 3. We don't have a solid timeline for proposing for Stage 3, but the soonest possible time would be in the January 2019 meeting (and likely later). 
  - [x] I have read and filled out the [Self-Review Questionnare on Security and Privacy](https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/). The answer to all questions is "no"--the only possible security-related concern was related to the possibility of adding more precise `Date.now()`-like functionality, which this proposal currently omits.
  - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [API Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/)

You should also know that...

It would be helpful to get feedback on which date/time units are useful/needed for web APIs (e.g., this proposal omits a duration type). The date/time types here may enable changes in the TAG's API Design Principles, c.f., https://github.com/w3ctag/design-principles/issues/101

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):

  - [x] open issues in our Github repo for each point of feedback
  - [ ] open a single issue in our Github repo for the entire review
  - [ ] leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify [github usernames]

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/311