- From: Matt Falkenhagen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 21:10:52 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 26 October 2018 21:11:14 UTC
Yes I think https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1195#issuecomment-433041948 was meant for another issue as we didn't discuss this particular proposal at the F2F (though we did talk about #1026 and static routes, etc). @jakearchibald I think you meant your comment for #913 ? I think we can go ahead and close this issue #1026 or static routes are more likely solutions, and given bgirard's comment. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1195#issuecomment-433544457
Received on Friday, 26 October 2018 21:11:14 UTC