Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Provide a one-line way to listen for a waiting Service Worker (#1222)

> Workbox can automate adding arbitrarily complicated code to the SW, but it can't automagically drop code in the window.

@dfabulich we're currently working on a `workbox-window` library, and one of its goals is to ease this pain with some helper methods as well as explanatory logging in dev mode.

A *skip waiting flag* would at least let us know when **not** to show such a message if we knew skip waiting had already been applied after the install phase. It's not a complete solution, but it does help with part of this.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1222#issuecomment-432926430