Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Add IDBTransaction commit() method (#242)

@aliams Thank you for explaining!

I read that paragraph as stating that the transaction must be committed in an atomic write. I understood the sentence you quoted as a brief explanation what "atomic" means. I think the intent is only to state that the IDB API user should not be able to observe any partial writes.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/242#issuecomment-428387109

Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2018 23:28:14 UTC