Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] TAG Review Request: RTCQuicTransport (#303)

Thank you for raising the review. We've discussed this during the last call (and I have volunteered to provide feedback on this, but haven't managed to find time until now) and we share the concerns from  @martinthomson regarding this being dependent on a incomplete spec.

During the last call, we generally found that the explainer may need a bit more coverage on the problems this proposal is attempting to solve, including tradeoffs and generalization potential outside of the scope of WebRTC.

The API pattern being built on top of the WebSockets design feels quite a lot like a limitation rather than a convenience, which we'd like to hear if there is potential for alternative approaches on.

While the lower layer access mechanism does feel like a extremely useful addition to the platform, but the limited scope would be something we'd like to discuss in depth. If you plan to meet during TPAC, that might be a good time to sit down and discuss this in detail. (We'll make sure someone representing the TAG is also there, hopefully up to date with more background on the work)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/303#issuecomment-428223699