- From: Dominick Ng <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 01:27:50 -0700
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 5 October 2018 08:28:12 UTC
It looks to me like Web Publications currently proposes using `<link rel="publication">`, not `<link rel="manifest">` (https://w3c.github.io/wpub/#wp-linking). In fact, https://github.com/w3c/wpub/issues/132 suggests that they are considered just extending the web app manifest and retiring their separate manifest file. Either way, an explicit MIME type doesn't seem necessary for us, and I'm not even sure it's semantically valid to distinguish two `<link rel>` tags by the type alone. - the relationship is still indicated to be the same via the `rel` member Readium appears to not be following the Web Publications spec at this point - I would suggest opening an issue with them to see why they don't align. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/721#issuecomment-427286482
Received on Friday, 5 October 2018 08:28:12 UTC