- From: Asami <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 22:45:51 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2018 05:46:14 UTC
In the current spec, we enqueue a new job to _jobQueue_ if it is not equivalent to the last job of a _jobQueue_. Spec says ( [Schedule Job 6.](https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#schedule-job-algorithm) ): > 1. Let lastJob be the element at the back of jobQueue. > 2 .If job is **equivalent** to lastJob and lastJob’s job promise has not settled, append job to lastJob’s list of equivalent jobs. > 3. Else, set job’s containing job queue to jobQueue, and enqueue job to jobQueue. Also **equivalent** means in the spec ( [dfn-job-equivalent](https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#dfn-job-equivalent) ): > Two jobs are equivalent when their job type is the same and: > - **For register and update jobs, both their scope url and the script url are the same.** > - For unregister jobs, their scope url is the same. I think script type and update via cache should also be the same for equivalent register and update jobs. Because we might ignore a new job which has different script type/update via cache if we do not add this check. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1358
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2018 05:46:14 UTC