- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 06:17:05 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2018 14:17:27 UTC
It seems weird to me if it bypasses the image fetching pipeline and caches defined therefore. I'd prefer sticking to `const response = await fetch(...); img.srcObject = response` initially. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/49#issuecomment-442073429
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2018 14:17:27 UTC