Re: [whatwg/storage] Proposal: Add detailed usage breakdown in estimate() (#63)

@jarryd999 If the plan going forward is more buckets, I agree that this approach makes sense and works.  I also like the idea of formalizing the values via explicit dictionary keys with the zero values not being [present](https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#dfn-present) and therefore [not exposed to JS](https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#es-dictionary).

As an aside, Firefox is moving how we store localStorage and so we would plan to expose it via this mechanism.  Also, our underlying storage for ServiceWorkers is via Cache API in a separate namespace, but it makes sense to break that out separately from content's use of Cache API so we would do that too.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/storage/issues/63#issuecomment-439477850