Re: [w3c/editing] Move execCommand to WICG (#184)

>  I think my main concerns are addressed, unless there are some legal aspects that I am unaware of

It's exactly the same as with the WG. People who are not members can't make normative contributions to the spec without being members. Taking minutes, fixing typos, adding examples, other administrivia would not be substantive. But a new feature, or massive changes to the API, etc. would be.    

> If there is nothing like that, it probably doesn't make much of a difference to our work.

Literally just a coat of paint: 
http://w3c.github.io/editing/execCommand.html?specStatus=CG-DRAFT&wg=WICG

> If there is nothing like that, it probably doesn't make much of a difference to our work. I don't understand the point of doing it, but I am not a lawyer.

Sorry I've failed to explain the benefits clearly enough. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/184#issuecomment-438507201