Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review Accessibility Object Model (#134)

Thanks for the extra feedback!

I appreciate the suggestion about localising the `getComputedAccessibleNode()` call to the Node instance, but I was curious if you could provide some more context for that advice. We essentially intended to follow the model of `getComputedStyle()` more or less for consistency, so I'm interested in why we'd want to diverge, especially since AFAIK it'd be the first method on Node which returns a promise.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/134#issuecomment-436491233