- From: Henri Sivonen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:30:54 -0800
- To: whatwg/encoding <encoding@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2018 08:31:16 UTC
> I don't trust it. In particular, in Blink once you pass a string to an IDL method it turns into an embedder string, which doesn't support zero-copy substrings. Do we need to care about the characteristics of the substring operation on the C++ side of WebIDL? It seems to me the side that matters here is the JS side. Or do you mean that in Blink a JS string that points to the buffer of another JS string gets copied on the IDL layer but a JS string that is the exclusive owner of its buffer doesn't get copied? > Even if the copy is free, it still creates more garbage that has to be collected at some point. I defer to JS engine developers on whether this matters. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/69#issuecomment-436170510
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2018 08:31:16 UTC