Re: [whatwg/fetch] Defining Access-Control-Expose-Headers parsing (#827)

@MattMenke2 right, Chrome now fails the `,bb-8` test (it doesn't result in exposure of the `bb-8` header, whereas before it would likely have exposed `bb-8` as is required behavior for this header. So that's a regression of sorts in a way.

(Still looking for thoughts on ABNF versus fully-defined parsers. I'm somewhat inclined to go with the latter, but I'll do some more research.)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/827#issuecomment-435332113

Received on Friday, 2 November 2018 10:13:29 UTC