Re: [w3c/webcomponents] JSON "modules" (#770)

@CarterLi Is this about the time period where some browsers support JSON-modules whereas others do not? And so might want to send the `.json` file to browsers that support it.

In the long term this won't matter as all browsers would *eventually* support the feature if it was added, but I definitely see that having browsers use an `Accept` header would make it simpler as new formats are added as you could just give a webpack-ed module to a browser with the header `Accept: text/javascript` but provide JSON directly to a browser with `Accept: text/javascript, application/json`.

While it only really benefits the transitional periods, it may still be worthwhile as more module formats (e.g. Wasm, HTML modules, etc) are in development so there's likely to be a long set of transitional periods for various module formats.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/770#issuecomment-435204367