- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:39:24 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/encoding <encoding@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2018 07:39:54 UTC
If we did separate objects, I'd drop Transform from the name and go with `TextDecoderStream` and `TextEncoderStream` to make them easier to remember. I'd also define two mixins for the members these objects share with `TextDecoder` and `TextEncoder` so they can have a single definition. And then for any parts of the remaining algorithms that are shared I'd also define shared steps so that it's clear what is shared and what is different. I don't think it would be that bad, but I'm also not entirely convinced that reusing `TextDecoder` and `TextEncoder` will turn out badly. Most folks will copy-and-paste and for the remainder that might read the documentation we could make that clear enough. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/72#issuecomment-376427525
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2018 07:39:54 UTC