- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 06:54:48 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 26 March 2018 06:55:18 UTC
I think it'd be a lot worse if, e.g., Fetch had to write `<a for=URL lt="URL fragment">fragment</a>` rather than `<a for=URL>fragment</a>`. And you do actually want that term since as I showed in my example above it's clear from context what the fragment belongs to. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/375#issuecomment-376064402
Received on Monday, 26 March 2018 06:55:18 UTC