- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 09:08:27 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 17 March 2018 09:08:53 UTC
Reading through the thread again it seems the main problem is that it's still unclear what the semantics should be. E.g., @justinfagnani argues the records need to be kept and @trusktr argues just those for the node in question need to be removed (it's unclear to me how that'd work, we don't store sufficient information for that today). If someone can figure out a proposal here in terms of concrete changes to the specification it might be easier to obtain implementer interest. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/126#issuecomment-373905775
Received on Saturday, 17 March 2018 09:08:53 UTC