- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 19:21:36 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2018 19:22:00 UTC
I'd be fine with it doing something different. The Selectors error-recovery behavior is considered a legacy mistake; if we were writing it today we'd split on top-level commas and throw out only the entries we didn't recognize. querySelector() (or a future version) could do the same. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/39#issuecomment-372787561
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2018 19:22:00 UTC