- From: Jake Archibald <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 16:15:35 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1283/review/101968490@github.com>
jakearchibald requested changes on this pull request.
> - 1. Set |request|'s [=service-workers mode=] to "`none`".
- 1. Set |request|'s [=request/cache mode=] to "<code>no-cache</code>" if any of the following are true:
- * |registration|'s [=service worker registration/update via cache mode=] is "`none`".
- * The [=current global object=]'s [=force bypass cache for importscripts flag=] is set.
- * |registration|'s [=last update check time=] is not null and the time difference in seconds calculated by the current time minus |registration|’s [=last update check time=] is greater than 86400.
- 1. Let |response| be the result of <a lt="fetch">fetching</a> |request|.
- 1. If |response|’s <a for="response" href="https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/376">cache state</a> is not "<code>local</code>", set |registration|’s [=service worker registration/last update check time=] to the current time.
- 1. [=Extract a MIME type=] from the |response|'s [=unsafe response=]'s [=response/header list=]. If this MIME type (ignoring parameters) is not a [=JavaScript MIME type=], return a [=network error=].
- 1. If |response|'s <a>unsafe response</a>'s [=response/type=] is not "<code>error</code>", and |response|'s [=response/status=] is an <a>ok status</a>, then:
- 1. [=map/Set=] <a>script resource map</a>[|request|'s [=request/url=]] to |response|.
- 1. Return |response|.
- 1. Else:
- 1. If <a>script resource map</a>[|url|] [=map/exists=], return <a>script resource map</a>[|url|].
- 1. Else, return a <a>network error</a>.
+ 1. If |serviceWorker|'s [=service worker/script resource map=][|request|'s [=request/url=]] [=map/exists=], return [=service worker/script resource map=][|request|'s [=request/url=]].
+ 1. If |serviceWorker|'s [=state=] is *installed*, *activating*, *activated*, or *redundant*, return a [=network error=].
nit: Would it be better to say "Not *parsed* or *installing*"?
> @@ -165,7 +165,9 @@ spec: webappsec-referrer-policy; urlPrefix: https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-refe
A [=/service worker=] has an associated <dfn export id="dfn-skip-waiting-flag">skip waiting flag</dfn>. Unless stated otherwise it is unset.
- A [=/service worker=] has an associated <dfn export id="dfn-imported-scripts-updated-flag">imported scripts updated flag</dfn>. It is initially unset.
+ A [=/service worker=] has an associated <dfn export id="dfn-classic-scripts-imported-flag">classic scripts imported flag</dfn>. It is initially unset.
+
+ A [=/service worker=] has an associated <dfn export id="dfn-include-updated-resources-flag">include updated resources flag</dfn>. It is initially unset.
Should this be "include**s** updated resources flag"? "Include" sounds it an action, as in something will be included, whereas "includes" sounds more like a statement.
> @@ -2147,8 +2155,12 @@ spec: webappsec-referrer-policy; urlPrefix: https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-refe
A <a>job</a> has a <dfn id="dfn-job-worker-type">worker type</dfn> ("<code>classic</code>" or "<code>module</code>").
+ A [=job=] has a <dfn export id="dfn-job-script-resource-map">script resource map</dfn> which is an <a>ordered map</a> where the keys are [=/URLs=] and the values are [=/responses=].
This is only used in the update algorithm. Unless I'm missing something, it could just be a variable within the update algorithm.
> A <a>job</a> has an <dfn id="dfn-job-update-via-cache-mode">update via cache mode</dfn>, which is "`imports`", "`all`", or "`none`".
+ A [=job=] has a <dfn id="dfn-job-potentially-include-updated-resources-flag">potentially include updated resources flag</dfn>. It is initially unset.
Again, this is only used in the update algorithm.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1283#pullrequestreview-101968490
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2018 16:16:02 UTC