Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] CSS ::part and ::theme pseudo elements (#230)

> Hm, we could, but I like the => glyph for readability. ^_^ It's not clear in part="id2 id3" which part is the element's sub-part and which is the part name it's exposing; I think id2 => id3 communicates clearly that id2 is becoming id3.

I understand but I would very strongly object to that syntax because it would make parsing in JS a lot harder and creates a lot more complicated parsing rules. We can call for consensus if you'd like.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/230#issuecomment-370675336