- From: Marijn Kruisselbrink <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:20:56 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 29 June 2018 17:21:18 UTC
I think Jake's (and at least mine) question is: if this has to be an asynchronous API anyway, what's the benefit of having something SW specific over just using a "normal" storage API (i.e. cache storage, IDB or some not-yet-existing async localstorage style API)? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1331#issuecomment-401419372
Received on Friday, 29 June 2018 17:21:18 UTC