Re: [w3c/editing] contenteditable-disabled (#176)

@masayuki-nakano: This proposal grows out of the feedback from many JS editors over the years. We have a resolution to move forward with this initial proposal, but I don't think anyone is opposed to changing the attribute name or the mechanism by which the functionality is achieved as long as this is somehow provided.

I don't think that designmode been discussed so far. It would be interesting to hear from editors that use designmode about this. @Reinmar for CKEditor. We should also get someone from TinyMCE to look at this. And maybe we need to make a list of other current editors making use of design mode.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/176#issuecomment-400951486