Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() promise should resolve after promotion to .active (#1187)

As noted in the original post, we resolve immediately in other cases too. AFAICT there is a rather limited case where we try to resolve it to something meaningful. It only happens when the service worker is already installed AND the active worker has no events AND something asks the installed worker to call skipWaiting(). Changing the meaning of the promise that much seems to add complexity for little gain.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1187#issuecomment-398586777