- From: Jeffrey Yasskin <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:52:28 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2018 20:52:55 UTC
@mnot and @reschke are better folks to ask than me. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-01#section-1 (note the non-current draft number) discusses why not to use JSON in HTTP headers, but of course doesn't apply to payloads. Note that the latest version of draft-reschke-http-jfv is https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reschke-http-jfv-08, not the -02 that the Reporting spec refers to. If you go to Structured Headers, the difficulty is that `Report-To` is an array containing maps (so far we're good with a [Parameterised List](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-06#section-3.3)), containing an [array](http://wicg.github.io/reporting/#endpoints-member) (uh-oh, but sometimes doable with a space-delimited string), containing maps (nope). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/195#issuecomment-396729800
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2018 20:52:55 UTC