Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Maintain the list of functional events (#1322)

annevk commented on this pull request.



> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ spec: webappsec-referrer-policy; urlPrefix: https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-refe
   <section dfn-for="service worker">
     <h3 id="service-worker-concept">Service Worker</h3>
 
-    A <dfn export id="dfn-service-worker" for="">service worker</dfn> is a type of <a>web worker</a>. A [=/service worker=] executes in the registering [=/service worker client=]'s [=/origin=].
+    A <dfn export id="dfn-service-worker" for="">service worker</dfn> is a type of <a>web worker</a>. A [=/service worker=] executes in the registering [=/service worker client=]'s [=/origin=]. [=/Service workers=] define <dfn export id="dfn-lifecycle-events">lifecycle events</dfn>, {{install!!event}} and {{activate!!event}}. [=/Service workers=] and specifications that <a href="#extensibility">extend</a> [=/service Workers=] define set of events called <dfn export id="dfn-functional-events">functional events</dfn> including {{fetch!!event}}. (See the <a href="#execution-context-events">list</a> of [=lifecycle events=] and [=functional events=].)

I think this sentence is a bit confusing as it mixes "service worker" the concept with "Service Worker" the specification. A specification defines things. A concept is and has things.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1322#pullrequestreview-126252734