- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 23:20:04 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2018 06:21:05 UTC
* I see you removed the request's initiator dependency, thanks! * `target` seems wrong for workers. I don't think we should deviate too much from https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#subresource-request et al. * Instead of `destination` accepting a string, I think we should reuse `fetch` as a value there similar to https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-potential-destination. * The document purports to be in the Public Domain and under copyright owned by Google. * I'm a little uncomfortable sharing all this data. It seems like it could easily make #76 much worse. * I'm also not entirely persuaded by "H/2 compression will save us". The whole point of adding compression there was to reduce the existing bloat, not to provide a way to add more. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/280#issuecomment-394594731
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2018 06:21:05 UTC