- From: jan-ivar <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2018 06:36:59 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 2 June 2018 13:37:21 UTC
(In response to bz) I think the weird decision would be to say all required arguments must be positional. I think we left out the advent of the nested dictionary. Arguably, that's when we invited complexity. At least two specs have shown they want rules about when arguments are required based on (grouping of) other arguments. The question is whether WebIDL can express it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/76#issuecomment-394088187
Received on Saturday, 2 June 2018 13:37:21 UTC