Re: [whatwg/streams] Does pipeTo() wait for writes to complete even when there are no writes? (#945) from Domenic Denicola on 2018-07-31 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from July 2018)

From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:39:09 +0000 (UTC)
To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/streams/issues/945/409286681@github.com>

Hmm. I'm not sure I'm happy that we prescribe a particular number of microtasks in such cases, especially since we're semi-intentionally using ambiguous wording like "wait".

Maybe we could make my above thoughts explicit, by inserting something like

> Optionally, wait an additional user-agent determined amount of time. NOTE: this is intended to help avoid tightly specifying the number of microtasks in zero-chunk or immediately-errored cases.

WDYT?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/945#issuecomment-409286681

Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2018 16:39:37 UTC